An Inquiry into Sociability through Spatial Configuration of Urban Environment A Case Study of Haft-tir Square

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Environmental design, Faculty of environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In today's urban environments, maintaining dynamism and engagement poses significant challenges, leading cities to become static and unresponsive. Designers have proposed various initiatives, with a particular focus on squares as pivotal components shaping social processes through human-environment interaction. This study aims to identify the role of urban spatial configuration in fostering sociability, social receptivity, and cohesion within the urban fabric, specifically examining how urban form influences social interaction and space dynamics. Squares typically serve as focal points due to their significance in facilitating social interactions. Therefore, this study zeroes in on Haft-tir Square in Tehran as a case study. Employing the Space Syntax method for analyzing spatial configuration, the study compares social receptivity levels between two urban design layouts. Findings reveal that even minor alterations aimed at enhancing pedestrian-friendly environments significantly optimize spatial organization, thereby strengthening social receptivity in urban squares. A comparison between the current state of Haft-tir Square and its proposed redesign highlights improvements in accessibility, crucial for fostering social interactions. Overall, this research underscores the importance of spatial arrangement and design in creating accessible spaces, enhancing transportation efficiency, mitigating traffic congestion, and promoting equal opportunities for social interactions within urban squares. Implementing physical strategies to pedestrianize urban areas plays a pivotal role in boosting the sociability index of urban spaces, particularly in revitalizing urban squares, which have gradually lost their significance in the urban landscape.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Acar, H., Yavuz, A., & Eroglu, E. e. (2012). Analysis of activity, space and user relations in urban squares. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(9). doi:10.1177/1420326X20942271
Aelbrecht, P. (2016). Fourth places’: the contemporary public settings for informal social interaction among strangers. Urban Design, 21, 124-152.
Alberti, L. B., Bartoli, C., & Leoni, G. (1986). The Ten Books of Architecture: The 1755 Leoni Edition. New York: Dover Publications.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silve, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. London: Oxford University Press.
Batty, M. (2022). Integrating space syntax with spatial interaction. Urban Informatics, 1(4). doi:10.1007/s 44212-022-00004-2
Benaicha, S., Alkama, D., & Walid Al-Azhari, W. (2023). The Effect of Structural Characteristics of Design on Social Use and Interaction in Public Spaces -The Case of the Theater Square in Algeria. Human and Social Sciences, 50(1), 77-98. doi:10.35516/hum.v50i1.4390
Bendjedidi, S., Bada, Y., & Meziani, R. (2019). Urban plaza design process using space syntax analysis:: El-Houria plaza, Biskra, Algeria. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 125-142. doi:10.14246/irspsda.7.2_125
Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., & Heath, T. O. (2003). Urban Spaces-Public Places: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Carr, S., Mark, F., Leanne, R., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
Chitrakar, R. (2015). Transformation of public space in contemporary urban neighbourhoods of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: An investigation of changing provision, use and meaning. Geography, Sociology. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.18702.56647
Cullen, G. (1976). Townscape. New York: Van Nostrand Rienhold.
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272-309. doi:10.1080/15213269. 2015.1015 740
Cutini, V. (2014). Spatial analysis of urban squares. Land Use, Mobility and Environment. Retrieved from www.dic.unipi.it/v.cutini
Danesh Pajouh, H. (2022). Recognition of Urban Squares categorization by Using USCCM Matrix. Urban Manage Energy Sustainability, 2(2), 116-126. doi:10.22034/ijumes.2017.18.12.027
Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Urban Design, 14(1), 65-84. doi:10.1080/13574800802451155
Gaca, S., & Tracz, M. (2012). Two lane roads with multifunctional median lane. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 801-810. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.929
Gehl Architects. (2010). Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Gehl Architects: www.gehlarchitects.com/#/1 59787/
Gehl, J. (1996). Life between buildings: using public space (3rd ed.). Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
Golicnika, B., & Thompson, C. W. (2010). Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces. Landscape Urban Plan, 94, 38–53.
Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
Hasgül, e. (2015). Space As Configuration: Patterns of Space. 9th Theory and History of Architecture Conference. İstanbul.
He, Y. (2023). A Review of the City Square. In Physical Characteristics of Urban Square and Sociability (Vitality) in the Context of Urban Revitalization. Sydney. doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-218-7_19
Hellberg, R., Guaralda, M., & Rinchumphu, D. (2021). Urban walkability profiles in Brisbane. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development, 9(3), 1-15. doi:10.14246/irspsd.9.3_1
Hillier, B. (1993). Specifically architectural theory: a partial account of the ascent from building as cultural transmission to architecture as theoretical concretion. 9, pp. 9-27. Harvard Arch Rev. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1027/
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, A. (1993). Great Streets. New York: MIT Press.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Jakle, J. K. (1987). The visual elements of landscape. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Joo, Y., Kim, S., Kim, B., & al., e. (2023). Autonomous vehicles and street design: Exploring the role of medians in enhancing pedestrian street crossing safety using a virtual reality experiment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 188. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107092
Kamruzzaman, M., Washington, S., Baker, D., & al., e. (2016). Built Environment Impacts on Walking for Transport in Brisbane, Australia. Transportation, 43(1), 53-77. doi:10.1007/s111 16-014-9563-0
Karimi, K. (2012). A reflection on 'Order and Structure in Urban Design. Space Syntax, 3(1), 38-48.
Karimi, K. (2023). The Configurational Structures of Social Spaces: Space Syntax and Urban Morphology in the Context of Analytical, Evidence-Based Design. Land, 12(11). doi:10.3390/ land12112084
Kim, J. K., & Kim, Y. O. (2022). Residents’ Spatial-Usage Behavior and Interaction According to the Spatial Configuration of a Social Housing Complex: A Comparison between High-Rise Apartments and Perimeter Block Housing. Sustainability, 14(3). doi:10.3390/su14031138
Klarqvist, B. (1993). A Space Syntax Glossary. The Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 2, 11-12.
Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Community Development, 53(4), 516-517. doi:10.1080/15575330.2022.2118937
Kyriakidis, C., & Bakogiannis, E. (2018). How the physical characteristics may affect the social life of streets in Athens, Greece? European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Jan, 5(1), 15-23. doi: 10.2641 7/ejser.v12i1
Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Legby, A. (2010). Urban segregation and urban form: From residential segregation to segregation in public space. Stockholm: KTH School of Architecture.
Legeby, A. (2013). Patterns of co‐presence: Spatial configuration and social segregation. Stockholm: KTH School of Architecture.
Lennard, S. H., & Lennard, H. (1984). Public Life in Urban Places: Social and Architectural Characteristics Conducive to Public Life in European Cities. Gondolier Press.
Li, Y., & Tsukaguchi, H. (2005). Relationship between network topology and pedestrian route choice behaviour. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 241-248.
Lindquist, M., Lange, E., & Kang, J. (2016). From 3D landscape visualization to environmental simulation: The contribution of sound to the perception of virtual environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 216-231. doi:10.1016/j.landurbpla
Long, Y., & Thill, J. C. (2015). Combining smart card data and household travel survey to analyze jobs–housing relationships in beijing’, Comput., Environ. Urban Syst., 53, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys. 2015.02.0 05. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 53, 19-35. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.02.0 05
Loo, B. P. (2021). Walking towards a happy city. Transport Geography, 93. doi:10. 1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103078
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lynch, K. (1981). A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lynch, K., & Hack, G. (1984). Site planning. Cambridge: MIT press.
Marcus, C. C., & Francis, C. (1998). People Places-Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. John Wiley & Sons.
Marcus, L. (2010). Spatial Capital: A proposal for an Extension of Space Syntax into a More General Urban Morphology. Space Syntax, 1(1), 30-40.
Marcus, L., & Berghauser Pont, M. (2015). 043 What can typology explain that configuration can’t? 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, 43. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/282360200
Marcus, L., Giusti, M., & Barthel, S. (2016). Cognitive Affordances in Sustainable Urbanism: Contributions of Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition. Urban Design, 21(4), 439-452. doi:10.1080/135748 09.2016.1184565
Marcus, L., Peponis, J., & Berghauser Pont, M. (2020). In Street Network Connectivity and Urban Dynamics’, 21BB Model Region Berlin-Brandenburg (pp. 60-71). Zurich: Eds Barbara Hoidn and Wilfried Wang . Retrieved from www.park-books.com
Mazouz, S. (2013). Fabrique de la ville en Algérie et pérennisation d’un modèle: Le cas de la nouvelle ville Ali Mendjeli à Constantine. Laboratoire Lacomofa, 23-30.
Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Third Places and the social life of streets. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 779-805. doi:10.1177/0013916509344677
Mitchell , W. J. (1996). City of bits: space, place and infobahn. Massachusetts: Massachusetts institute of technology.
Mossop, E. (2001). Public space: Civilising the city. (E. Mossop, & P. Walyon, Eds.) City Spaces: Art & Design, 10-26.
Moughtin, C. (1992). Urban Design – Street and Square. Bulter worth Architecture.
Moyano, A., Stępniak, M., & al., e. (2021). Traffic congestion and economic context: changes of spatiotemporal patterns of traffic travel times during crisis and post-crisis periods. Transportation,, 48(6). doi:10.1007/s11116-021-10170-y
Muraleetharan, T., & Hagiwara, T. (2007). Overall level of service of urban walking environment and its infuence on pedestrian route choice behavior: analysis of pedestrian travel in Sapporo, Japa. Transportation Research Board, 7-17.
Nag, D., Sen, J., & Kishore Goswami, A. (2022). Measuring Connectivity of Pedestrian Street Networks in the Built Environment for Walking: A Space Syntax Approach. Transportation in Developing Economies, 8(34). doi:10.1007/s40890-022-00170-7
Osmond, H. (1957). Function as the Basis of psychiatric ward design. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
PPS. (2003). what a successful place? Retrieved June 27, 2013 , from HTTP://www.pps.org/reference/grplace feat/
Rad, V. B., & Ngah, I. (2013). The Role of Public Spaces in Promoting Social Interactions. Current Engineering and Technology, 3, 184-188.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: Anonverbal Communication Approach. Information and Communication Technology Organization Press.
Saunders, C., Rutkowski, A. F., & van Genuchten, M. (2011). Virtual space and place: Theory and test. MIS Quarterly, 35(4). doi:10.2307/41409974
Seamon, D. (1994). The life of the place: a phenomenological commentary on Bill Hillier's theory of space syntax (Vol. 1). Nordisk Arkitekturforskning.
Sennette, R. (1974). The Fall of Public Man (Reissue edition ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Sitte, C. (1965). City Planning according to Artistic Principles. London: Phaidon Press.
Steele, F. (1981). The Sense of Place. Boston: Cbi Publishing Company.
Syed Mahdzar, S. S. (2008). Sociability Vs Accessibility Urban Street Life. London: University College London. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.18479.79524
TechTarget Contributor. (2023). whatis/definition/configuration. Retrieved from www.techtarget.com.
Thiel, P. (1961). A Sequence-experience notion for Architectural and Urban Space. Town Planning Review, 32, 33-52.
Thwaites, K., Romice, o., Porta, S., & Greaves, M. (2017). Urban Design and Quality of Life. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_14
Van Eldijk, J., Gil, J., & Marcus, L. (2022). Disentangling barrier effects of transport infrastructure: synthesizing research for the practice of impact assessment. European Transport Research, 14(1). doi:10.1186 s12544-021-00517-y
Van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. Switzerland: Springer.
Whyte, H. W. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Washington: Conservation Foundation.
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington D.C.: Conservation Foundation.
Xu, H., Yuan, M., & Li, J. (2019). Exploring the Relationship between Cycling Motivation, Leisure Benefits and Well-Being. Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 157-171. doi:10.14246/irspsda.7.2
Yaseen, A. (2017). Inclusive aspects of urban design: sociability, walkability and overall ambiance. Chinese J Urban Environ Studies, 5(1), 1–17. doi:10.1142/S2345748117500014
Yavuz, A. (2009). Studying the concept of the permeability in the urban pedestrian shopping streets; sample of the Eastern Black Sea cities. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Ye, Y., Yeh, A. G., & Zhuang, Y. e. (2017). “Form Syntax” as a contribution to geodesign: A morphological tool for urbanity-making in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International, 22(1). doi:10.1057/s41289-016-0035-3
Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., & Wu, Z. e. (2023). Using Space Syntax in Close Interaction Analysis between the Elderly: Towards a Healthier Urban Environment. Buildings, 13(6). doi:10.3390/buildings13061456
Zucker, P. (1959). Town and Square. New York: Columbia University Press.