Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility. This means that the reviewers chosen by the journal will be closely related to the topic and content as the paper.

At the initial stage, papers will be evaluated by the editorial to examine whether they meet the scope and publication standards of this journal. The outcome of this stage will be either rejecting the papers or preparing and sending them to the further evaluation.  

The manuscripts that pass the initial reviewing process will undergo a double-blind reviewing. Every paper is at least assigned to two or more reviewers (combination of reviewers introduced by you and the ones selected by journal) and if all the reviewers denied to review your paper, it will be redirected to you with a note saying (Reviewers Denied to Review). The minimum criteria required to decide on each paper, is two identical answers from the asigned reviewers.

Editors of the Journal reserve the right to accept, reject and edit any article in any stage, if necessary. The sole responsibility for the whole contents if the article remains only with the authors.